本書提供了珍貴的第一手資料,使我們得以觀察布拉格學派思想的傳承和發(fā)展。由于布拉格學派成員的國際性,研究領(lǐng)域的多親性,任何一部讀本都難以反映學派的全貌,而只能作為一個便利的出發(fā)點。
Preface
Philip A.Luelsdorff
Ⅰ.STUDIES IN SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS
Sentence Patterns and Verb Classes
On the So-Called Semantic and Grammatical Stlucture of the Sentence
Subject and Predicate
On Case Theory
Some Thoughts on the Semantic Structure of the Sentence
Valency and Intention
The Sentence as a Text Unit
Ⅱ.STUDIES IN MORPHOLOGY
On Morphological Oppositions
Ⅲ.LEVELS OF LANGUAGE SYSTEM
Hierarchy and Overlap ofLanguage Levels
Notes on the So:Called Transposition
On Analogy and Anomaly
Ⅵ. GRAPHEMICS
Some Remarks on Revaluations of Redundant Graphemes
Ⅴ. LEXICON
The Invariant Meaning of Derived Words
Comparison of the Vocabularies of Related and Unrelated Languages
Ⅵ. SOCIOLINGUISTICS
Code Switching without Bilingualism in Czech
Ⅶ. CONTRASTIVE LINGUISTICS
Contrastive Comparison and Other Types of Polylingual Description
On the Contrastive Study of Cognate Languages
Index of authors
Index of subjects
On the So-Called Semantic and Grammatical Structure ofthe Sentence*
Milo? Dokulil and Franti-ek Dane?
In recent years syntactic investigations have undergone new revival anddevelopment.Besides syntheric works,also a series of valuable contribu-fions in iournals and miscdlanies has appeared.However,it must be statedtllatthisdevelopment suffersfromahighmethodological,notional andalsoterminologicaldisparity,andoftenevenfromalackofclearanalysis.Thuswe are convinced that in the given situation it is necessary and urgent toreconsider the general questions of sentence structure,to aim at a clarification of the basic notions and of the principles of the procedure of syntacticanalysis.In this contribution we certainly do not try to present a definitivesolution to the given questions;rather.ideas are presented for discussion.We take up insights of older scholars.a(chǎn)nd attempt to clarify the principalviewpoints which should be used as starting points for the analysis ofsyntax.
Whenformulating(oranalyzing)asenteace,erofthelanguagehastoknownotonlYtheconstructionalmaterialofthe senfence,thewords andtheir syntactic properties and possibilities,but also the overall constructionplan of the sentence,which is determined in principle by its integral“grammatical”meaning,i.e. by an entire abstraction of the sententialconicnL Precisely in the sense in which the grammatical properties ofwords represent hasically a (high-level) abstraction of the specific lexicalmeanings of words and of specific relationships between these meanings (certainly,these grammatical properties are not only a reflection ofreality,but also an expression of the organizing principle of sentence structure).